Get In Touch

Consulting

Contact: Kacy Miller

Phone: 214 824 4115

Fax: 214 276 7477

Request Information

Contact Form

Related Content

Downloads

vCard

Biography (PDF, 1.7M)

Brochure

Portfolio

Your audience expects powerful visuals. Use them to your advantage.

With full graphic resources as part of our comprehensive consulting services, we not only help you promote the facts that best support your argument, but also provide you with visuals that enhance understanding and increase retention.

We create everything from simple charts and exhibit call-outs, to timelines, technical illustrations and dynamic 3-D animations.

A few samples are provided below.

Demonstratives

Note: Please click on the icons below for more information.

• 
  Plaintiff resigned employment and sustained injuries in a car accident sixteen days later. In order to qualify for insurance coverage, the plaintiff needed to be gainfully employed. Therefore, within 24-hours of the car accident, plaintiff obtained counsel and rescinded her resignation letter. Plaintiff later filed a lawsuit to recover medical costs and lost wages. Our client created a timeline to punctuate the attorney-driven nature of the lawsuit.
• 
  In a medical malpractice lawsuit, one of the alternative causes for plaintiff's injury was known as “volvulus.” In order to help the defense expert explain this concept to the jury, an illustrative graphic was created.
• 
  The technology in question dealt with complicated computer software processes. A series of creative illustrations was developed to assist the fact witness in explaining how the technology worked.


• 
  A chart summarizing the defendant’s invalidity defense was created to complement expert witness testimony and for use in Closing Argument.
• 
  A key theme in our trial story was that defendant “squeezed out” our client from key business dealings. A creative illustration was presented to the jury during Closing Argument to contextualize damages.
• 
  A simple flow chart was created to educate the jury about the relationship between the key parties.

• 
  A series of exhibit call-outs was created for key exhibits containing handwritten correspondence about the conduct of the defendant. Our client used the defendant’s own project notes to help prove allegations of design defect.
• 
  Our client argued that the owner/obligee wanted reimbursement for construction designs that were never part of the original design plans and specifications. Rather than show the jury complicated architectural drawings, CourtroomLogic developed a series of creative illustrations to help illustrate the core elements of each plan.
• 
  A series of creative illustrations was developed to punctuate differences between design plans. A summary chart of creative illustrations provided the jury with a powerful reminder that the original plans were substantively different than the as-built plans.


• 
  Plaintiff claimed that it “didn’t know” about our client’s use of its trademark in the same industry. A timeline was created for use in Closing Argument to help punctuate the numerous opportunities plaintiff had to learn about the defendant's use and plaintiff’s utter silence for more than four years.
• 
  Plaintiff argued to the jury that its lighthouse logo was unique and therefore was infringed, but it argued to the PTO that only “minor differences” were needed to make a lighthouse distinguishable from another. Because our client wanted to point out the opposing positions to the jury, a chart contrasting the plaintiff’s prior PTO Office Action Response and current trial testimony was created.
• 
  A core argument of our client's defense was that the USPTO had issued many lighthouse-related trademarks, and that the mere use of a lighthouse mark did not indicate willful infringement. A chart of other issued trademarks was created to help minimize allegations of confusion.

• 
  A color-coded chart was created to help jurors connect the specific claim language with the figures in question.
• 
  A color-coded visual was created to help jurors connect the specific claim language with the figures in question.
• 
Defendant took the position that very few credits were ever issued to plaintiff during their business relationship. Rather than inundate jurors with hundreds of meaningless and complicated credit slips, CourtroomLogic created a clean visual to capture our argument that defendant’s practice and habit was to honor credit memos.